How Virtual Reality is Creating Community for Future Engineers
Reading time: 8 minutes
Picture this: Sarah, a first-year biomedical engineering student, sits in her dorm room staring at a complex circuit diagram for a medical monitoring device. She knows she should collaborate with peers, but the campus is large, her classmates are scattered across different residences, and scheduling in-person meetings is challenging. She feels isolated and frustrated, despite choosing a field that fundamentally revolves around teamwork and human connection. This scenario plays out daily in biomedical engineering programs worldwide—a field that demands collaborative problem-solving yet often struggles to foster these essential connections among incoming students 1 .
Biomedical engineering students often work in isolation despite the field's collaborative nature.
Virtual reality creates immersive collaborative spaces that transcend physical limitations.
Now imagine a different experience: Sarah puts on a lightweight virtual reality headset and suddenly finds herself in a digital laboratory where she can manipulate 3D models of human organs, assemble complex medical devices with classmates who appear as lifelike avatars, and practice communicating with healthcare professionals in simulated clinical settings. This isn't science fiction—it's the emerging reality of biomedical engineering education that's not only transforming how students learn but fundamentally reshaping how they connect with one another.
The challenge of building community in biomedical engineering is more than just a social concern—it's an educational imperative. Research indicates that experiential learning environments are crucial for preparing biomedical engineers for real-world clinical settings where interdisciplinary collaboration can literally be a matter of life and death 1 . Traditional approaches have relied on resource-intensive in-person immersions, but these present significant limitations in accessibility and scalability, especially for large student cohorts. Virtual reality offers a promising alternative—one that not only solves practical constraints but potentially enhances the community-building experience itself.
When we discuss virtual reality in education, we're referring to a spectrum of technologies that create immersive digital experiences. Virtual reality (VR) completely immerses users in a computer-generated environment, while augmented reality (AR) overlays digital information onto the real world. Together with mixed reality (MR), these technologies form what experts call "extended reality" (XR)—a continuum of digital experiences that blend physical and virtual worlds 6 .
Complete immersion in digital environments
Digital overlays on the physical world
Seamless blending of physical and digital
What makes these technologies particularly powerful for education is their ability to create presence—the psychological sensation of "being there" even when physically located elsewhere. This sense of shared presence is the foundation upon which virtual communities can be built. When students can make eye contact with avatars of their classmates, collaboratively manipulate the same 3D model of a medical device, or collectively solve problems in a simulated emergency room, they form connections that mirror those developed through physical shared experiences.
Biomedical engineering sits at the intersection of multiple disciplines—medicine, biology, engineering, and technology. This interdisciplinary nature makes community-building particularly challenging yet absolutely essential. Students must learn to communicate across professional boundaries and understand diverse perspectives—skills difficult to cultivate in traditional classroom settings 1 .
Virtual environments excel at bridging these disciplinary divides by creating shared simulated spaces where engineering students can collaborate with future healthcare providers, biologists, and computer scientists. These spaces allow for repeated practice with immediate feedback in realistic but low-risk scenarios—whether diagnosing equipment malfunctions in an ICU or designing assistive devices for patients with mobility challenges .
"Virtual reality holds promise as an educational tool to offer simulated clinical scenarios that are effective in training BME students for interprofessional collaborations."
Educational institutions worldwide are recognizing this potential. Universities like Georgia Tech, University of Washington, and University of Central Florida have developed sophisticated AR/VR facilities and incorporated them into their biomedical engineering curricula 5 . The University of Michigan has even developed dedicated online courses in XR design and development, recognizing that these technologies represent not just teaching tools but essential components of future biomedical practice .
A groundbreaking 2020 study conducted an innovative experiment to determine whether VR could effectively teach the collaborative skills essential to biomedical engineering 1 . Researchers created two simulated clinical scenarios centered on solving medical device-related problems—a malfunctioning intravenous pump and a faulty oxygen concentrator. Interdisciplinary teams comprising biomedical engineering and nursing students worked together to diagnose and solve these problems in a physical simulation lab.
Interdisciplinary teams solved medical device problems in physical labs.
Sessions were recorded using 3D-180 degree VR cameras.
Students experienced both VR and 2D versions of the same scenarios.
Detailed surveys evaluated learning experiences and immersion levels.
The key innovation came next: researchers recorded these sessions using an Insta360 EVO 3D-180 degree VR camera, then created both traditional 2D videos and immersive VR versions of the same interactions. Sixteen biomedical engineering students were then divided into two cohorts—those who had experienced the in-person simulation and those who hadn't—and asked to watch both types of videos while completing detailed surveys assessing their learning experiences.
The VR videos allowed students to feel physically present in the clinical scenarios, freely looking around the environment to observe team interactions from multiple perspectives. The traditional 2D videos, by comparison, presented a fixed viewpoint of the same interactions 1 . This careful experimental design enabled direct comparison of both video formats against each other and against the gold standard of in-person immersion.
The findings were striking. Students consistently reported that VR videos provided significantly greater immersion than traditional 2D videos, with many describing the sensation of "being there" in the clinical setting. This enhanced presence translated into better understanding of team dynamics and communication patterns 1 .
Perhaps most notably, students who had previously experienced in-person clinical immersion reported that VR served as a highly effective alternative when physical access wasn't feasible. They noted that the virtual environment captured essential elements of the clinical experience while allowing for repeated viewing and analysis from multiple angles—advantages not available in one-time physical immersions 1 .
The research team concluded that "VR holds promise as an educational tool to offer simulated clinical scenarios that are effective in training BME students for interprofessional collaborations" 1 . This finding has significant implications for creating virtual communities, suggesting that shared VR experiences can effectively replicate the bonding and collaborative learning that occurs in physical shared spaces.
| Learning Aspect | Preferred VR (%) | Preferred 2D (%) | No Preference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immersion in Clinical Scenario | 81 | 13 | 6 |
| Understanding Team Roles | 75 | 19 | 6 |
| Assessing Communication | 69 | 25 | 6 |
| Professional Collaboration | 75 | 19 | 6 |
| Knowledge of Other Professions | 69 | 25 | 6 |
Data adapted from student surveys comparing learning experiences between VR and traditional 2D videos 1
| Component | Function | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| VR Headsets | Provides immersive visual/audio experience | Oculus Quest, HTC Vive Pro, HP Reverb |
| 360-Degree Cameras | Captures real-world environments for VR | Insta360 EVO, GoPro Max |
| 3D Modeling Software | Creates virtual objects and environments | Blender, Maya, Adobe Creative Cloud |
| Game Engines | Develops interactive virtual experiences | Unity, Unreal Engine |
| Backpack Computers | Enables untethered VR movement | HP Omen X Compact, MSI VR One |
| Motion Tracking | Captures and translates real movements to VR | OptiTrack, HTC Vive Trackers |
Equipment information synthesized from multiple implementation examples 1 9
| Implementation Model | Key Features | Institutional Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Lab Spaces | 24/7 access to simulated equipment and collaborative tools | MIT.nano Immersion Lab, Penn State Immersive Lab 9 |
| Remote Collaboration | Distance students work together in shared virtual environments | UC Berkeley's InsightXR platform |
| Cross-Disciplinary Integration | Engineering students collaborate with healthcare trainees | Clinical simulation studies 1 |
| Industry Partnerships | Virtual internships with medical device companies | Purdue's Skill-XR program |
| Virtual Research Groups | Undergraduate research conducted in digital environments | Chatham University's NASA collaboration 2 |
Data visualization showing student preferences across different learning aspects when comparing VR to traditional 2D video instruction.
How can biomedical engineering programs effectively translate these research insights into practical community-building initiatives? The most successful implementations share several key characteristics:
Introduce virtual spaces gradually, beginning with orientation activities where new students explore campus landmarks and meet classmates through avatars before progressing to complex clinical simulations.
Develop collaborative problem-solving exercises that require mixed teams of engineering, nursing, pre-med, and computer science students—mirroring real-world healthcare environments 1 .
Use virtual environments to facilitate connections between incoming students and advanced peers who can guide them through complex simulations and share practical academic advice.
Create virtual "office hours" where faculty members appear as avatars in dedicated virtual spaces, lowering barriers to interaction for shy or remote students.
Evaluating the effectiveness of virtual community-building requires looking beyond standard academic metrics. Programs should track:
The University of Central Florida has pioneered such comprehensive assessment approaches, finding that students who participate in structured virtual collaborations demonstrate significantly improved communication skills and professional identity formation 5 .
The potential for virtual reality to transform biomedical engineering education extends far beyond temporary adaptations. We're witnessing the emergence of a new educational paradigm—one where physical and digital communities coexist and enhance one another. As the technology continues to evolve, we can anticipate even more sophisticated implementations.
Virtual patients who respond uniquely to different team approaches, creating realistic clinical interactions.
Technology that simulates the tactile experience of medical device manipulation and surgical procedures.
Students from different continents collaboratively solving healthcare challenges in shared virtual spaces.
The implications for diversity and inclusion are particularly promising. Virtual environments can reduce barriers related to physical mobility, social anxiety, and geographical isolation while creating more equitable access to simulated clinical experiences that might otherwise be limited to students at well-resourced institutions 4 .
"The virtual spaces we build today aren't just alternatives to physical community—they're proving grounds for the interdisciplinary collaborations that will define the future of healthcare innovation."
What began as a solution to physical separation has evolved into an opportunity to reimagine the very nature of learning community in biomedical engineering. The future belongs to programs that recognize this potential—not merely using VR as a fancy teaching tool but as a foundational element for building the connected, collaborative, and creative biomedical workforce that our world needs.
References will be populated here.