Discover how a groundbreaking plasma-based technique enables rapid, simple, and inexpensive spatial patterning of wettability in microfluidic devices for double emulsion generation.
Imagine a tiny, self-contained universe within a droplet smaller than a raindrop: a water droplet encased in an oil shell, floating in water again. These intricate double emulsions are the secret behind everything from cancer-fighting drug delivery systems that release their payload at precisely the right moment to the burst of flavor in a piece of gourmet chocolate.
For years, however, reliably creating these microscopic marvels has been a formidable challenge for scientists. The very tools used to make them—microfluidic chips—require a kind of internal artistry, with specific regions of their tiny channels needing to be either water-loving (hydrophilic) or water-repelling (hydrophobic). Achieving this patterned "wettability" has traditionally been a complex, time-consuming, and expensive process, acting as a bottleneck for innovation.
But now, a groundbreaking technique using a flash of plasma is changing the game, offering a rapid, simple, and inexpensive solution that is opening new frontiers in science and industry 7 .
Precise encapsulation and controlled release of therapeutic agents.
Creation of uniform microcapsules and particles for advanced materials.
Enhanced flavors and textures in gourmet foods and beverages.
At its core, a double emulsion is a droplet within a droplet, suspended in a third, continuous fluid. The most common types are water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) and oil-in-water-in-oil (O/W/O). Think of a tiny aquatic globe (water) surrounded by a protective oily shell, all floating within a larger body of water. This core-shell structure is what makes them so valuable.
They are also used as tiny templates for creating perfectly uniform microcapsules and particles used in materials science, and as miniature self-contained labs for studying single cells or growing protein crystals.
Microfluidics is the science of manipulating fluids in channels thinner than a human hair. It offers unparalleled control, allowing scientists to create perfectly uniform (monodisperse) droplets one by one. In a typical microfluidic device for generating W/O/W double emulsions, three fluids meet at precise junctions: an inner water stream, a middle oil stream, and an outer water stream. The channel geometry forces these fluids to interact in a way that the oil neatly wraps around the inner water droplet, and the outer water then shears off this core-shell structure into a perfectly formed double emulsion droplet 1 3 .
However, this elegant process has a catch: surface wettability. In the tiny world of microfluidic channels, surface forces dominate. For the droplets to form correctly and not stick to or break apart on the channel walls, the walls must have the right affinity for the fluids.
To make the inner water droplet, the channel must be hydrophobic (oil-loving) so the water is repelled and pinched off into a droplet.
PDMS's inherent hydrophobicity is perfect for making simple water-in-oil droplets, but a major obstacle for double emulsions. For years, scientists have had to develop cumbersome workarounds to create hydrophilic regions on PDMS.
Injecting liquid chemicals or polymers into the channels and using UV light with a mask to graft them onto specific areas 3 . This is effective but time-consuming, requires multiple steps, and risks clogging the delicate channels.
Building up thin films of hydrophilic polymers by sequentially injecting solutions with positive and negative charges, while using another fluid to protect regions meant to stay hydrophobic 3 . This is a labour-intensive and delicate process.
The innovative solution, as highlighted in a 2021 study in Analytical Chemistry, is a rapid, simple, and inexpensive method that uses corona plasma treatment to spatially pattern wettability 7 . The principle is elegant: when oxygen plasma, a soup of charged ions, hits a PDMS surface, it oxidizes it, replacing hydrophobic methyl groups with hydrophilic hydroxyl (-OH) groups. The breakthrough lies in controlling where this plasma goes.
This technique uses two clever strategies to guide the plasma, all within a single, standard PDMS device 1 7 :
The inlet ports near the channels that need to remain hydrophobic are simply blocked with tape, preventing plasma from entering.
The chip design itself includes narrow channel constrictions that act as "corona resistance" barriers. These constrictions naturally limit the diffusion of the plasma ions, creating a sharp boundary between treated and untreated regions.
Create master mold and cure liquid PDMS to form micro-channels.
Bond chip to substrate and bake to recover native hydrophobicity.
Apply plasma treatment through selective inlets to create hydrophilic regions.
Inject fluids to generate monodisperse double emulsions.
| Solution Phase | Example Components | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Inner Aqueous Phase | Tween 20, Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), Buffer (Tris-KCl) | Forms the innermost water droplet; surfactants stabilize the inner water-oil interface. |
| Middle Oil Phase | Hydrofluoroether (HFE) oil with a fluorosurfactant (e.g., Krytox) | Forms the immiscible shell that separates the inner and outer water phases. |
| Outer Aqueous Phase | Tween 20, Pluronic F-68, high molecular weight PEG (PEG35k) | The continuous phase that shears the core-shell stream into droplets; surfactants prevent coalescence. |
The effectiveness of this approach is immediately visible. Under a microscope, the device produces a highly uniform stream of double emulsion droplets. The monodispersity—the consistency in droplet size—is exceptional, with coefficients of variation for inner and outer diameters as low as 3.8% and 3.1%, respectively 6 . This level of uniformity is on par with, or even surpasses, what is achieved with far more complex techniques.
| Flow Rate Ratio (Inner:Middle:Outer) | Inner Diameter (µm) | Outer Diameter (µm) | Shell Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1:3:10 | 25 | 65 | 20 |
| 2:3:10 | 35 | 70 | 17.5 |
| 3:3:10 | 40 | 75 | 17.5 |
| Feature | Traditional Coating Methods | Spatial Plasma Patterning |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | Multi-step, requires liquid injection and sometimes UV masking 3 | Single-step, no internal fluids needed 7 |
| Time & Cost | Time-consuming, labour-intensive, and requires expensive chemicals 3 | Rapid (minutes) and inexpensive 7 |
| Scalability | Difficult to scale up for mass production 1 | Highly scalable; many devices can be patterned simultaneously 1 |
| Reliability | Prone to clogging and inconsistent coating 3 | Highly reliable and reproducible 1 |
The study demonstrated the practical utility by creating gelatin microgels—tiny, cross-linked particles with potential uses in tissue engineering.
Researchers encapsulated and grew yeast cells within the droplets and used flow cytometry to screen them, opening doors for high-throughput single-cell analysis.
The development of rapid, simple, and inexpensive spatial wettability patterning is more than just a technical improvement; it is a democratizing force in microfluidics. By removing a major fabrication barrier, it allows more researchers to explore the fascinating world of double emulsions and their vast applications without being experts in surface chemistry.
Precise delivery of chemotherapy drugs and other therapeutics.
Creation of novel materials with controlled properties.
Development of novel food textures and flavor delivery systems.
This innovation, alongside emerging technologies like 3D-printed microfluidics with built-in wettability contrasts 3 , points toward a future where the design and fabrication of sophisticated micro-devices is limited only by our imagination. In the quest to harness the power of tiny droplets, a simple spark of plasma has provided a brilliantly clear path forward.
References will be added here in the appropriate format.